Global Veterinary Intelligence
Reader login
Veterinary33

Free reader access

Every article remains open. Registration is for participation, not access.

Create a profile to comment, join discussions, receive more relevant recommendations, keep your activity connected, and access selected opportunities.

Latest News · Industry Update · 2 min read

A Survey Examining Attitudes Towards Equine Complementary Therapies for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Injuries

19 views

Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of wastage in equine athletes.

December 15, 2025 at 2:00 PM UTCVeterinary33Veterinary33 Editorial Desk

Comments on this article are also part of the Veterinary33 clinical forum.

A Survey Examining Attitudes Towards Equine Complementary Therapies for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Injuries

Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of wastage in equine athletes. There has recently been an increase in the popularity of complementary and alternative veterinary medicine (CAVM), as horse owners explore options to reduce recovery times and decrease the risk of re-injury.

There is however a lack of scientific investigation into the efficacy or extent of CAVM use within the equine industry. An online questionnaire was developed to examine horse owner perceptions and use of CAVM and to explore the client-veterinarian relationship. Of the 423 respondents, 96% had used a form of CAVM on their horse, the most popular of which were massage (71%), chiropractic manipulation (59%) and magnetic therapy (54%).

The growth in popularity of CAVM has likely resulted from encouraging results of equivalent treatment therapies in human studies. However, these treatments are not without drawbacks. Massage and chiropractic manipulation suffer from a lack of enforced licensing of practitioners, whilst magnet therapy has not presented significant benefits in human or equine research. Of the respondents, 50% were ‘very satisfied’ with their veterinarian and 74% felt their veterinarian was receptive towards suggestions they made regarding treatment of their horse. Despite this, 81% would try new therapies without consulting their veterinarian; a decision that is unfounded given that the awareness and understanding of CAVM and training available to veterinarians has increased.

The client-veterinarian relationship should be considered important to the future integration of CAVM into conventional veterinary medicine and qualitative research is recommended to provide a better understanding of this relationship.


Authors: Jack Thirkell, Rebecca Hyland

Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/

Discussion thread

Community replies

0 replies

No replies yet

No replies yet. Be the first professional to join this discussion.

Join this discussion

Add your reply

Share a professional insight, ask a focused question, or add relevant clinical experience.

Member participation

Log in to join the discussion

Share an answer, ask a question, reply to another professional, or mark useful contributions as helpful.

Log in to reply

Continue the conversation

Share this article with another veterinary professional.

LinkedInEmail
Articles remain free

Create a profile when you are ready to participate.

Veterinary33 does not require registration to read its articles. A free reader profile connects your discussions, recommendations, professional details, and reader activity.

After registration or login, you will return to this exact article.

Registered readers may also receive selected educational and community opportunities.

Join discussions

Comment on articles and participate in professional conversations.

Relevant recommendations

Use your reading and engagement activity to surface more useful articles.

Connected reader activity

Return to your likes, comments, discussions, and article activity in one place.

Professional profile

Add your profession, specialty, workplace, biography, and profile image.

Registration is optional

Continue reading