Global Veterinary Intelligence
Reader login
Veterinary33

Free reader access

Every article remains open. Registration is for participation, not access.

Create a profile to comment, join discussions, receive more relevant recommendations, keep your activity connected, and access selected opportunities.

Latest News · Industry Update · 1 min read

Antibacterial prescribing patterns in small animal veterinary practice identified via SAVSNET: the small animal veterinary surveillance network

12 views

In this study, data from veterinary clinical records were collected via the small animal veterinary surveillance network (SAVSNET).

August 11, 2025 at 12:00 PM UTCVeterinary33Veterinary33 Editorial Desk

Comments on this article are also part of the Veterinary33 clinical forum.

Antibacterial prescribing patterns in small animal veterinary practice identified via SAVSNET: the small animal veterinary surveillance network

In this study, data from veterinary clinical records were collected via the small animal veterinary surveillance network (SAVSNET).

Over a three-month period, data were obtained from 22,859 consultations at 16 small animal practices in England and Wales: 69 per cent from dogs, 24 per cent from cats, 3 per cent from rabbits and 4 per cent from miscellaneous species.

The proportion of consults where prescribing of antibacterials was identified was 35.1 per cent for dogs, 48.5 per cent for cats and 36.6 per cent for rabbits. Within this population, 76 per cent of antibacterials prescribed were β-lactams, including the most common group of clavulanic acid-potentiated amoxicillin making up 36 per cent of the antibacterials prescribed.

Other classes included lincosamides (9 per cent), fluoroquinolones and quinolones (6 per cent) and nitroimidazoles (4 per cent). Vancomycin and teicoplanin (glycopeptide class), and imipenem and meropenem (β-lactam class) prescribing was not identified. Prescribing behaviour varied between practices. For dogs and cats, the proportion of consults associated with the prescription of antibacterials ranged from 0.26 to 0.55 and 0.41 to 0.73, respectively.


Authors: A. D. Radford, P. J. Noble, K. P. Coyne, R. M. Gaskell, P. H. Jones, J. G. E. Bryan, C. Setzkorn, Á. Tierney, S. Dawson

Source: https://bvajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/

Discussion thread

Community replies

0 replies

No replies yet

No replies yet. Be the first professional to join this discussion.

Join this discussion

Add your reply

Share a professional insight, ask a focused question, or add relevant clinical experience.

Member participation

Log in to join the discussion

Share an answer, ask a question, reply to another professional, or mark useful contributions as helpful.

Log in to reply

Continue the conversation

Share this article with another veterinary professional.

LinkedInEmail
Articles remain free

Create a profile when you are ready to participate.

Veterinary33 does not require registration to read its articles. A free reader profile connects your discussions, recommendations, professional details, and reader activity.

After registration or login, you will return to this exact article.

Registered readers may also receive selected educational and community opportunities.

Join discussions

Comment on articles and participate in professional conversations.

Relevant recommendations

Use your reading and engagement activity to surface more useful articles.

Connected reader activity

Return to your likes, comments, discussions, and article activity in one place.

Professional profile

Add your profession, specialty, workplace, biography, and profile image.

Registration is optional

Continue reading