Global Veterinary Intelligence
Reader login
Veterinary33

Free reader access

Every article remains open. Registration is for participation, not access.

Create a profile to comment, join discussions, receive more relevant recommendations, keep your activity connected, and access selected opportunities.

Latest News · Industry Update · 1 min read

Prognosis in Equine Medical and Surgical Colic

8 views

A retrospective study was performed on 649 horses admitted to the Clinic of Equine Internal Medicine (Utrecht University) for gastrointestinal colic.

November 21, 2025 at 2:00 PM UTCVeterinary33Veterinary33 Editorial Desk

Comments on this article are also part of the Veterinary33 clinical forum.

Prognosis in Equine Medical and Surgical Colic

A retrospective study was performed on 649 horses admitted to the Clinic of Equine Internal Medicine (Utrecht University) for gastrointestinal colic.

The aim of this study was to provide a better guideline for determining prognosis in horses with colic. Short- and long-term survival were evaluated, and Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the clinical and clinico-pathologic variables usable to predict survival. Intestinal displacements and strangulations were the most frequently diagnosed causes of colic. Regarding the surgically treated horses, 54% were discharged and 88% of these were still alive after 1 year. In comparison, 85% of medically treated patients were discharged and 93% were still alive after 1 year. Only 4.4% of all long-term survivors did not return to the expected level of performance, and 32% suffered from recurrent colic.

Duration of colic signs, heart rate, intestinal motility, skin tenting, level of pain, and gross appearance of peritoneal fluid were shown to be significantly associated with survival. White blood cell count, packed cell volume, blood pH, and color of the mucous membranes did not show any prognostic significance. Thus, clinical variables appeared to be the most relevant predictors of the outcome of gastrointestinal colic.


Authors: Marianne A. van der Linden, Céline M. Laffont, Marianne M. Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan

Source: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/

Discussion thread

Community replies

0 replies

No replies yet

No replies yet. Be the first professional to join this discussion.

Join this discussion

Add your reply

Share a professional insight, ask a focused question, or add relevant clinical experience.

Member participation

Log in to join the discussion

Share an answer, ask a question, reply to another professional, or mark useful contributions as helpful.

Log in to reply

Continue the conversation

Share this article with another veterinary professional.

LinkedInEmail
Articles remain free

Create a profile when you are ready to participate.

Veterinary33 does not require registration to read its articles. A free reader profile connects your discussions, recommendations, professional details, and reader activity.

After registration or login, you will return to this exact article.

Registered readers may also receive selected educational and community opportunities.

Join discussions

Comment on articles and participate in professional conversations.

Relevant recommendations

Use your reading and engagement activity to surface more useful articles.

Connected reader activity

Return to your likes, comments, discussions, and article activity in one place.

Professional profile

Add your profession, specialty, workplace, biography, and profile image.

Registration is optional

Continue reading